Web 1.0 was inven­ted to allow phys­i­cists to share research papers.
Web 2.0 was cre­ated to allow people to share pic­tures of cute cats.

there­fore…

Based on my exper­i­ence, I’d offer the hypo­thesis that any suf­fi­ciently advanced read/write tech­no­logy will get used for two pur­poses: por­no­graphy and act­iv­ism. Porn is a weak test for the suc­cess of par­ti­cip­at­ory media—it’s like tap­ping a mike and ask­ing, “Is it on?” If you’re not get­ting porn in your sys­tem, it doesn’t work. Act­iv­ism is a stronger test—if act­iv­ists are using your tools, it’s a pretty good indic­a­tion that your tools are use­ful and usable.

Ethan Zuckerman’s The Cute Cat The­ory Talk at ETech